Jump to content
News threads can only be replied to, not created.

Cotentin - Returning to Brittany Ferries in 2021


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, neilcvx said:

Now all we need is Nova star to join the fleet 😉😂

Polferries must have had a crystal ball as they have bought her outright halfway through her charter.  Must have known BF was thinking of shifting Barfy then...😂.  Now if LD had put her in Poole in direct competition instead of rejecting her...😉

And my crystal ball was about when Libby was still lounging around in the shipyard in Australia...

Nova Star - let her get on with it in Poland for a while...😉

 

Edited by Khaines
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 495
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

A few of her from the pilot boat this morning. 

Hope this is ok - uploaded to you tube.    

The only place she can go right now is back down the canal towards the sea. Any other direction and she's likley to get a bit stuck. Ed

Posted Images

10 hours ago, Fine Whine said:

one of the most stupid decisions BF ever made

The results of a poll on that one would make interesting reading! 😉

(Wonder where the scrubber installation programme, the new website, the sale of VDL and the omission of the restaurant on Armorique would come! 🤣)

Acquisition of Condor may turn out to trump them all....but as you say, most of the big decisions can only be evaluated in hindsight.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Gareth said:

The results of a poll on that one would make interesting reading! 😉

(Wonder where the scrubber installation programme, the new website, the sale of VDL and the omission of the restaurant on Armorique would come! 🤣)

Acquisition of Condor may turn out to trump them all....but as you say, most of the big decisions can only be evaluated in hindsight.

 

I did specifically say -one of the most stupid decisions Gareth-.....;)

And if I had the time I could quite vigorously defend most of the other 4 you quote but you're correct, a first class degree in hindsight is one of those things I reget never having obtained

Chris

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Think any stupid decision, regarding Cotentin, was operating her from Poole and having her do Cherbourg.  As has been said here before, she was very successful with the Spain route.  Now, if they had kept her solely to Spain, or operated her from Portsmouth to Cherbourg, things might have worked out better the first time instead of giving Barfy the chop.  Could her Spanish rotations included more sailings if she had had a different timetable? 

Edited by Khaines
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Khaines said:

Think any stupid decision, regarding Cotentin, was operating her from Poole and having her do Cherbourg.  As has been said here before, she was very successful with the Spain route.  Now, if they had kept her solely to Spain, or operated her from Portsmouth to Cherbourg, things might have worked out better the first time instead of giving Barfy the chop.  Could her Spanish rotations included more sailings if she had had a different timetable? 

As the Manche region put up quite a bit of cash for the Cotentin they wanted her running to Cherbourg.  When the building of the Cotentin was announced BF said she would operate Portsmouth-Cherbourg instead of from Poole but that changed before she was delivered, maybe it was negotiating tactic with PHC, maybe they realised they couldn't carry the range of hazardous cargo from Portsmouth as they could from Poole, who knows. The initial crossing time was 3 hours 45 minutes but that went back to 4 hours 15 minutes to save €€€.

I believe the success of the expanded Spanish services contributed quite significantly to the downturn in Poole-Cherbourg freight traffic. Before the Portsmouth-Spain services Barfleur and Coutances carried many Spain and Portugal bound HGV's who saw the short crossing time as an advantage so they could get back on the road a.s.a.p., now a lot of these take the direct routes and Poole-Cherbourg has gone from up to 4 sailings a day each way down to 1 (Brexit timetable not included). The weekend Cotentin sailing to Santander showed that there was significant demand for freight capacity to Spain, something which hadn't really been catered for by BF or P&O before as the Spanish services were really focused on passenger traffic, yes you could book freight on the sailings but they really wanted to use the vehicle deck space for cars.  Once BF saw the potential they went for the freight wholeheartedly with more freight orientated vessels like Cap Finistere which came with the added bonus of more passenger capacity while P&O stuck their head in the sand.  Even once Cotentin had started sailing full at weekends to Spain then P&O CEO Helen Deeble was telling staff that there was no freight market to Spain..... 🤦‍♂️

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Timmy said:

Even once Cotentin had started sailing full at weekends to Spain then P&O CEO Helen Deeble was telling staff that there was no freight market to Spain

I am still not convinced re the long term future of accompanied freight to Spain, it makes sense to extend the unaccompanied trailers (as per Poole Bilbao) and the container traffic, especially  as it will take longer to get clearance post Brexit. You won't be able to mix that with fast turnaround ropax ships. It will also lead to a trend to use the larger distribution companies who can employ drivers in multiple locations. I suspect that the BF mixed model has some problems ahead.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Fine Whine said:

one of the most stupid decisions BF ever made

You're right Chris it was a difficult one to predict. Her saving grace possibly is that she's a SOMANOR vessel, transferred to the rationalised singular society when the Le Havre route came into the fold. The three ports are their cross channel freight bread and butter so arguably there's a need for such a ship to augment these routes. Stena have never had a purchase option and during the initial couple of years it was touch and go whether they would take up the charter extension option. The charter swap for Etretat made sense, Stena didn't need her passenger numbers on the Baltic route but still wanted the freight lanes, BF wanted a bit of both and the Visentini is a good ship to start up a route... they're sparse yes but they're not uncomfortable, great sea keepers, (Epsilon proved just how good), economic and mostly very reliable.

BF did see the light quite quickly. Armorique was originally intended as an identical sister for SOMABRET which would have been a disaster, Breton freight figures are very poor compared particularly through their western most port, both Roscoff and St Malo are passenger routes first and foremost. The contract for her was very quickly changed to create a full RoPax design.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jonno said:

Armorique was originally intended as an identical sister

Thanks Jonno, I never knew that.  I knew she was modelled on the same hull design, but didn’t know Armorique was originally intended as a freighter.  Interesting, and explains quite a lot, even though I like Armorique and think she does what she does very well.  No reason why a Cotentin converted into a passenger ferry shouldn’t be equally successful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope they don’t rename her (as is often the case when freighters are turned into passenger ships).  Mind you, re-naming a ship within the fleet is not unknown in BF history (Benodet becoming Corbiere and Prince of Brittany becoming Reine Mathilde).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Gareth said:

Thanks Jonno, I never knew that.  I knew she was modelled on the same hull design, but didn’t know Armorique was originally intended as a freighter.  Interesting, and explains quite a lot, even though I like Armorique and think she does what she does very well.  No reason why a Cotentin converted into a passenger ferry shouldn’t be equally successful.

Yes she was originally ordered as a freight ferry. I agree, her size and twin loading ability make her very versatile. I know I often bang on about how poor freight is on her route so at times she's wasted but overall it's a positive BF exploit in times of dock strikes elsewhere. Due to Armorique and the nature of the Plymouth-Roscoff route BF always have freight space available and the longer overnight service allows drivers a full rest negating the issue of a longer drive on arrival. A most attractive proposition for hauliers... BF never need to say no. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Gareth said:

Hope they don’t rename her (as is often the case when freighters are turned into passenger ships).  Mind you, re-naming a ship within the fleet is not unknown in BF history (Benodet becoming Corbiere and Prince of Brittany becoming Reine Mathilde).

Hope she keeps her name.  We all know her as Cotentin - Barfy got hers back, so hopefully Cotentin will as well.  It is what she is known as BF wise.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, cvabishop said:

But with I believe, two full height freight decks, Cotentin would be very expensive to modify a la Armorique although something could be done no doubt, perhaps with a lower PAX capacity.

If they can rebuild her to match Armorique for £50m I think they'll do it. SOMANOR can use the charter fees they pay Stena for Etretat to offset any lending plus they'll probably increase their earnings at Le Havre with Normandie and use the money from Barfleur if they sell. BF already know what the design is capable of so they know they've got 2000 tonnes to play with in order for her to match her close sibling, you can have a lot of fun with that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No one is talking about the basics, the whole plumbing and electrical systems would have to be replaced.  You don't just add a load of cabins they all need services water and waste tanks etc would all need replacing above what was designed, would it be easy?

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, David Williams said:

Yes, she could be called after any small town on the Cotentin peninsula

Having been around some lovely places on the Cotentin peninsula, there are loads of places that would make great names for ships.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Solo said:

No one is talking about the basics, the whole plumbing and electrical systems would have to be replaced.  You don't just add a load of cabins they all need services water and waste tanks etc would all need replacing above what was designed, would it be easy?

 

No not easy but it's a blank canvas because what they have to play with is essentially fresh air, there's no superstructure to modify, the intricate plumbing and heating comes with the modular cabins and the cable gantries, conduit piping, plumbing etc is fitted above and below the block before it's added.. It's similar in design and practice to how FSG build their ferries, it's like Honfleur without the hull. Cotentin will be easier as she's hardly enclosed and these systems are designed to be replaced.

Consider lengthening, same principle, it's all there prior to being floated into place.

Cardboard compactor, waste shredder, glass chute/crusher, sewage, desalination et al is fitted into decks 1 & 2. We know the space is there, look at Armorique.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Gareth said:

I never knew that.  I knew she was modelled on the same hull design, but didn’t know Armorique was originally intended as a freighter.

The Armorique utilised the option for "a similar ship" that had been placed at the same time Cotentin was ordered. The order for Armorique (fully formed as a pax ship) was placed just 6 months after that for Cotentin so they will have known what they aimed to do when the option was placed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Slightly confused now - so was Armorique originally ordered as a freighter or a passenger ferry?  I had always understood the latter, but Jonno indicated it was the former.  Is what he described as her “intention” something that pre-dated the actual order?

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Gareth said:

Slightly confused now - so was Armorique originally ordered as a freighter or a passenger ferry?  I had always understood the latter, but Jonno indicated it was the former.  Is what he described as her “intention” something that pre-dated the actual order?

She was ordered as a passenger ship, the option just held a place in the yard's orderbook.

https://www.motorship.com/news101/industry-news/aker-and-brittany-ferries-sign-loi-for-ferry

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, jonno said:

No not easy but it's a blank canvas because what they have to play with is essentially fresh air, there's no superstructure to modify, the intricate plumbing and heating comes with the modular cabins and the cable gantries, conduit piping, plumbing etc is fitted above and below the block before it's added.. It's similar in design and practice to how FSG build their ferries, it's like Honfleur without the hull. Cotentin will be easier as she's hardly enclosed and these systems are designed to be replaced.

Consider lengthening, same principle, it's all there prior to being floated into place.

Cardboard compactor, waste shredder, glass chute/crusher, sewage, desalination et al is fitted into decks 1 & 2. We know the space is there, look at Armorique.

I didn't explain very well, I was thinking more about storage tanks etc down in the depths of the ship and the capacity of the electrical system, which would all have been built to handle a certain number of cabins and people on board.  As has been said it's all possible but it's not just a case of putting some cabins on top, it's a major job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barfleur has 72 cabins. Cotentin has 120 cabins.

Why would Brittany Ferries want to add more, and take up a lot of space, on a shorter sea route which usually sails at day? And if it doesn't it still has more cabins than Barfleur.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Andy changed the title to Cotentin - Returning to Brittany Ferries in 2021

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...